|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
TCHS 4O 2000 [4o's nonsense] alvinny [2] - csq - edchong jenming - joseph - law meepok - mingqi - pea pengkian [2] - qwergopot - woof xinghao - zhengyu HCJC 01S60 [understated sixzero] andy - edwin - jack jiaqi - peter - rex serena SAF 21SA khenghui - jiaming - jinrui [2] ritchie - vicknesh - zhenhao Others Lwei [2] - shaowei - website links - Alien Loves Predator BloggerSG Cute Overload! Cyanide and Happiness Daily Bunny Hamleto Hattrick Magic: The Gathering The Onion The Order of the Stick Perry Bible Fellowship PvP Online Soccernet Sluggy Freelance The Students' Sketchpad Talk Rock Talking Cock.com Tom the Dancing Bug Wikipedia Wulffmorgenthaler       |
|
bert's blog v1.21 Powered by glolg Programmed with Perl 5.6.1 on Apache/1.3.27 (Red Hat Linux) best viewed at 1024 x 768 resolution on Internet Explorer 6.0+ or Mozilla Firefox 1.5+ entry views: 1453 today's page views: 396 (18 mobile) all-time page views: 3293924 most viewed entry: 18739 views most commented entry: 14 comments number of entries: 1219 page created Sat May 24, 2025 08:49:08 |
|
- tagcloud - academics [70] art [8] changelog [49] current events [36] cute stuff [12] gaming [11] music [8] outings [16] philosophy [10] poetry [4] programming [15] rants [5] reviews [8] sport [37] travel [19] work [3] miscellaneous [75] |
|
- category tags - academics art changelog current events cute stuff gaming miscellaneous music outings philosophy poetry programming rants reviews sport travel work tags in total: 386 |
| ||
|
That's Liverpool vs Chelski! May be catching it later - as my cousin said, "I don't usually watch Pool or Chelsea matches, but both of them together...". Liverpool do have a good home record. Go Reds! :P ($146.50+$1601.45 = $1747.95/$1900) $10 on Liverpool to beat Chelski (at 2.50) - Great! $15 on Liverpool to draw Chelski (3.05) - Okay. $10 on Reading to beat Sheffield United (1.67) - It's not which club $10 on Newcastle to beat West Ham (1.75) - you are, but which club $10 on Portsmouth (-1.5) vs Charlton (2.30) - you're up against I'm still feeling for the schoolboys (literally, they were Uni students) of Laos, who were put to the sword by Singapore 11 to nothing a few days ago. The unashamedly pro-Singapore commentator seriously rubbed it in ("what a humiliation!") though it was more a matter of Laos being poor than Singapore showing any exceptional quality. One couldn't accuse them of schoolboy defending, for one. It was worse than that. Alam Shah had a field day, though all he had to do was hit the target. Can't fault his finishing, and he had a scissors kick that went in off the crossbar to round off his seven goals. What Rooney would give for that! They were rather poorer against Indonesia and were simply clearing the ball out in the final twenty minutes, which doesn't bode well for the semi-finals against Malaysia. 2-2 was enough, and Indonesia went out because they hadn't slaughtered Laos enough in their match (they only won 3-1), while Vietnam had the good fortune of playing Laos last and knew exactly what they had to do - win by three or more. They won by nine. That cost Indonesia manager Peter Withe his job. On a completely unrelated tangent, I think I've found my first textbook error for the semester! On page 555 of Hal R. Varian's Intermediate Microeconomics, it sez "... If head comes up you get $14 and if tails comes up you lose $10. This bet has an expected value of $12..." Looks like $2 to me. Is that right? Next: The Really Big Match
Trackback by Reviews on Skintervention Guide
|
|
|||||||||
 Copyright © 2006-2025 GLYS. All Rights Reserved. |
||||||||||
